Stephen Meyer Debunks the “God of the Gaps” Objection
Rejecting Theistic Evolution ≠ Embracing a God of the Gaps View at YouTubeA vacuous yet often heard objection to intelligent design decries ID as a “God of the gaps” argument. Here, Stephen Meyer requires less than three minutes to show that the complaint rests on a failure to understand a basic feature of the theory of ID. For more on this see the “God of the gaps” archive at Evolution News.
Related Articles
Averick Takes on the “God of the Gaps” Objection
- March 7, 2019
- 1
- Intelligent Design
Denis Lamoureux on the God-of-the-Gaps Fallacy
- September 28, 2018
- 10
- Faith & Science
Astonished and Amused by Lamoureux’s (Mis)Take on Intelligent Design
- June 13, 2018
- 17
- Intelligent Design
Mind the Gaps – Before Progressing Toward ID, Leisola Recounts Clearing Away Materialist Myths
- February 15, 2018
- 2
- Evolution
Does Darwin’s Doubt Commit the God-of-the-Gaps Fallacy?
- October 16, 2013
- 14
- Evolution
“God of the Gaps” Revisited
- March 20, 2013
- 5
- Faith & Science
Once Again, Why Intelligent Design Is Not a “God-of-the-Gaps” Argument
- January 9, 2013
- 6
- Faith & Science
The Self-Refuting “God of the Gaps” Critique
- October 18, 2012
- 2
- Intelligent Design
A Positive, Testable Case for Intelligent Design
- March 30, 2011
- 17
- Intelligent Design