The Truth About the Dover Intelligent Design Trial By: Staff Discovery Institute November 15, 2007
Responses to Dover Ruling
Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller vs. Dover Decision (DI Press, 2006)
Traipsing into Evolution is a book-length critique of federal Judge John E. Jones's decision in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case. In this concise yet comprehensive response, Discovery Institute scholars and attorneys show how Judge Jones's Kitzmiller decision was based upon faulty reasoning, non-existent evidence, and a serious misrepresentation of the scientific theory of intelligent design.
Dover in Review
A breakdown of the Dover intelligent design trial, by Dr. John G. West, associate director of the Center for Science & Culture
Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover
A law review article by David K. DeWolf, John G. West, and Casey Luskin published in Montana Law Review, Vol. 68 (Winter, 2007) critiquing the Kitzmiller ruling.
Brief of Amicus Curiae, The Discovery Institute
Legal brief filed by Discovery Institute about secular purposes for teaching about the scientific theory of intelligent design. [Revised version]
October 31, 2005
Discovery Amicus Brief Appendix A
Documentation showing the scientific theory of intelligent design makes no claims about the identity or nature of the intelligent cause responsible for life. [Revised version]
October 31, 2005
Dover Expert Witness Rebuttal CSC Senior Fellow William Dembski�s rebuttal of the reports by expert witnesses on the other side of the Dover ID case, specifically, Barbara Forrest, Robert Pennock, John Haught, Kevin Padian, and Kenneth Miller.
