teleology | Page 2 | Discovery Institute

^{George F.R. Ellis
June 11, 2018
Intelligent Design

2}

Wandering Towards a Goal

_{George F.R. Ellis
June 11, 2018
Intelligent Design

2}

How can a universe that is ruled by natural laws give rise to aims and intentions? Whether or not a human observer exists, the natural laws would continue to operate as they are indefinitely. The key difference between physics and biology is function or purpose. There is, in the standard scientific interpretation, no purpose in the existence of the Moonor an electron or in a collision of two gas particles. Read More ›

^{Stephen C. Meyer
May 13, 2014
Intelligent Design

1}

Complex Biological Systems: A Debate, part 1: Stephen Meyer Presents

_{Stephen C. Meyer
May 13, 2014
Intelligent Design

1}

Intelligent design or theistic evolution? In this video, filmed at the 2013 European Leaders’ Forum in Wisla, Poland, Dr. Meyer debates physicist Dr. Ard Louis on the origin of biological systems. Meyer presents the evidence for intelligent design, while Louis maintains that neo-Darwinian processes played a key role in the development of complex life. Part 1 is Dr. Meyer’s opening Read More ›

Zegiestow, Poland. 2019/8/10. Stained-glass window depicting the Creation of the World with the words

^{Jay W. Richards
April 21, 2011
Intelligent Design

29}

Catholics and Intelligent Design

_{Jay W. Richards
April 21, 2011
Intelligent Design

29}

Part One In three chapters of God and Evolution, I respond to the criticisms of ID from certain, but by no means all, Thomists such as Ed Feser. Feser (whose work I generally hold in high regard) recently wrote a lengthy response to my arguments. Since Feser reiterates many of his previous arguments in this response, I’ve decided to post several excerpts Read More ›

Amazing bird Kingfisher. Diving bird. Colorful nature background. Bird: Common Kingfisher. Alcedo atthis

^{Stephen C. Meyer
December 18, 2003
Intelligent Design

24}

Teleological Evolution

_{Stephen C. Meyer
December 18, 2003
Intelligent Design

24}

It is difficult to see what empirical content Lamoureux's teleological evolution has or how it differs in substance from standard Neo-Darwinism with its denial of any evidence of actual, as opposed to merely apparent, design. Read More ›

^{Mike Gene
July 10, 2000
Intelligent Design

9}

Miller and Behe on Origins

_{Mike Gene
July 10, 2000
Intelligent Design

9}

Ken Miller is a scientist who has been taking the lead as a critic of ID. Thus, I took a look at his review of Behe’s book, Darwin’s Black Box, found at http://biomed.brown.edu/Faculty/M/Miller/Behe.html There is really nothing in this review that I have not already replied to in [the ARN] forum. But there is one thing worth exploring in more Read More ›