SEATTLE, Wash. - The Discovery Institute is featured in a commentary on
the op-ed page in today's Washington Post about the controversy over the
teaching of evolution. The commentary, written by Post education
reporter Jay Matthews, argues in favor of teaching the controversy over
evolution in public schools and goes even further than Discovery in suggesting that it would also be a good idea to include intelligent design theory in biology classes.
Discovery supports teaching that controversy in the classroom: teach Darwin's theory of evolution, and, teach the many scientific critiques of evolution as well.
"Our approach has always been to focus on teaching students more about evolution, including a candid assessment of the theory's unresolved difficulties," says attorney Seth Cooper, Program Officer, Public Policy & Legal Affairs for Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. "Students should learn the scientific evidence for evolution, but they should also learn about some of the scientific criticisms about major parts of the theory being raised by mainstream scientists."
Discovery's Center for Science & Culture advocates the scientific theory
of Intelligent Design (ID), which holds that certain features of the
universe and living systems - such as the miniature machines, complex
circuits and digital information found in cells, and the digital code
found in DNA - are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an
undirected process such as natural selection acting on random.
Discovery does not advocate the teaching of ID theory in schools, but
supports teaching the scientific challenges to Darwinian evolution.
Matthews notes in his op-ed piece today that Discovery Institute
Fellow John Angus Campbell, a professor at the University of Memphis,
has been trying to coax more of his colleagues to allow their students
consider critics of Darwin.
"If you don't see the risks, if you don't see the gaps, you
don't see the genius of Darwin," says Campbell.