PBS Evolution

Abstract art artistic autumn — Photo by Pixabay on Pexels

^{Jonathan Wells
October 1, 2001
Intelligent Design}

Critics Want More Facts, While Darwinists Push Their Faith

_{Jonathan Wells
October 1, 2001
Intelligent Design}

Some of the "evidence" presented in Evolution is known to be false, and the remaining evidence provides surprisingly little support for Darwin's theory. In place of scientific evidence, Evolution relies on a parade of experts to assure us that Darwin had it right. Read More ›

^{Michael J. Behe
September 28, 2001
Intelligent Design}

Fatuous Filmmaking

_{Michael J. Behe
September 28, 2001
Intelligent Design}

To put the upcoming seven-part PBS series Evolution in perspective, think fat. Dietary fat. For decades folks in white coats have confidently assured the public that shunning fatty foods — bacon and eggs, butter, steak — would make for longer, healthier lives. Well, guess what? In The Soft Science of Dietary Fat, published in the March 30 issue of the Read More ›

^{Discovery Institute Press
September 17, 2001
Intelligent Design}

Getting the Facts Straight

_{Discovery Institute Press
September 17, 2001
Intelligent Design}

Accuracy and objectivity are what we should expect in a television documentary – especially in a science documentary on a publicly-funded network. But the PBS Evolution series falls far short of meeting these basic standards. It distorts the scientific evidence, ignores scientific disagreements over Darwin’s theory, and misrepresents the theory’s critics. The series also displays a sharply biased view of Read More ›