Edwards v. Aguillard

^{Casey Luskin
June 29, 2006
Intelligent Design}

What’s Up with Ronald Numbers? An Analysis of the Darwinist Metanarrative in the Journal of Clinical Investigation

_{Casey Luskin
June 29, 2006
Intelligent Design}

Ronald Numbers is a widely respected historian of science. He is an exceptional scholar who has garnered the respect of people on all sides of this debate. However, a recent article gives one pause to wonder if Numbers is shifting his role from commentator, to partisan. Read More ›

Un día en un gimnasio Panameño cuna de campeones mundiales de boxeo

^{Seth Cooper
February 13, 2004
Intelligent Design}

Discovery Institute Weighs In

_{Seth Cooper
February 13, 2004
Intelligent Design}

Dear Editor, Abraham Lincoln is often credited for the old maxim that “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.” If this statement is true then matters do not sit well for a few of the more extreme Darwinists who Read More ›

^{Foundation for Thought and Ethics, David K. DeWolf and Stephen C. Meyer
June 7, 1989
Intelligent Design}

Teaching the Controversy

_{Foundation for Thought and Ethics, David K. DeWolf and Stephen C. Meyer
June 7, 1989
Intelligent Design}

Public schools face a dilemma when they address the subject of biological origins. From the Scopes "Monkey Trial" (1925) to the Supreme Court's opinion in Edwards v. Aguillard (1987), the teaching of biological origins has put the public schools in the awkward role of resolving a controversy that divides scientists, educators, and the courts. While the experts debate the issues, and the media sometimes inflame the controversy, school boards, administrators, and teachers must still answer the question, What should we teach our students about how living organisms arose on earth? Read More ›