Richard Stevens

Fellow, Walter Bradley Center on Natural and Artificial Intelligence

Richard W. Stevens is a retiring lawyer, author, and a Fellow of Discovery Institute's Walter Bradley Center on Natural and Artificial Intelligence. He has written extensively on how code and software systems evidence intelligent design in biological systems. Holding degrees in computer science (UCSD) and law (USD), Richard practiced civil and administrative law litigation in California and Washington D.C., taught legal research and writing at George Washington University and George Mason University law schools, and specialized in writing dispositive motion and appellate briefs. Author or co-author of four books, he has written numerous articles and spoken on subjects including intelligent design, artificial and human intelligence, economics, the Bill of Rights and Christian apologetics. Available now at Amazon is his fifth book, Investigation Defense: What to Do When They Question You (2024).

Archives

Economics: It’s All About the Human Mind

What an ice-cold cola teaches about value, choice, and exchange
The sometimes-forbidding terminology economists use is rooted in very basic principles of human behavior, ones that can easily be illustrated.

Who Owns Your Mind’s Creative Work? Who Owned Dolly Parton’s?

The unsettling logic driving the movement to abolish copyright — and the counterargument rooted in the mind itself
Weddings, funerals, breakups at 2 a.m. — one song always shows up: “I Will Always Love You.” Whitney Houston sent it into the stratosphere. Lorelai Gilmore poured it out on Gilmore Girls. Yet it arose out of Dolly Parton’s soul in 1974, pure emotion turned into melody, lyrics, and musical history. So it’s Dolly’s song, right? It’s hers, she wrote it, she can license it, she can get paid for it. Right? Not according to attorney Stephan Kinsella. His 2025 article, “The Problem with Intellectual Property,” argues that Dolly shouldn’t have any rights to her own song. By that logic, she owns the paperclip holding her sheet music more than she owns the song itself. The movement to abolish your copyright Kinsella is a nationally known lawyer and …

Eyewitness Memory: Fallible Doesn’t Mean Worthless

It’s not about poor memories – it’s about asking neutral questions early and getting details known only to witnesses on site
The trend against eyewitness reliability seems part of the ideology that undermines finding objective truth.

Privacy Rights: Innermost Thoughts Can Smash Your Life

As I have discovered, justice can depend upon how adverse people view your private thoughts
After a police shooting, one answer may let the officer off; a different one may result in homicide charges. But both answers might be “truthful.”

Florida Hails a Surveillance Regime to Corral Renegade AI

Irony: You’ll need to surrender your privacy to government or multi-national AI before you can use AI that tracks you anyway
A few of us suggest individual users should know the risks and make the choices, leaving both government agencies and multi-national computer servers out of the picture.

“Please Say Your Phone License Number and Look Into the Camera”

Serious FCC proposal would require licenses to buy phones; AI talk-control is next.
The new law would require telephone service providers to “at a minimum, obtain and retain the name, physical address, government issued identification number, and an alternate telephone number of any new and renewing customer before granting access to its services.” 

Heavens! Are You an AI Denialist?

Accusations of “AI denialism” smear thoughtful critics as mentally disordered
Rosenberg purports to cite pundits saying chatbot outputs are “AI slop,” that “the era of rapid AI advancement is ending,” that “AI scaling has hit the wall,” and the AI boom is just another “tech bubble.” No human is cited for these remarks.

Does It Matter WHY a Chatbot Slanders You?

Google’s AI chatbot service blames users’ questions and unfixable software for the bot’s shocking defamation of a man’s character
Chatbots aren’t necessities. Meanwhile, long-esteemed laws and rules of conduct forbade slander and libel because they can seriously harm people.

Decode or Be Deceived: Read What Authorities Say Carefully

Increasingly we must examineclaims from experts — human or AI —carefully, instead of adopting their clever sound bites
Research presented at a 2025 Microsoft Research meet finds that people tend to think less carefully and critically when they rely on GenAI and online sources.

Autonomous AI War Technology Delivers Killer Robots

AI systems are designed to always carry out the mission. A software logic problem in special situations is a worst-case scenario that we must expect
If Luckey’s Anduril becomes the world’s AI weapons superstore it can enable any well-funded entity anywhere to have autonomous weapons for whatever use.

Dead Man “Returns” via Deepfake to Testify Against Killer

An eerie deepfake video was allowed to impersonate a manslaughter victim talking about his thoughts and feelings in the courtroom 
Bringing a deceased crime victim back to deliver a victim impact statement via deepfake video, ratchets up the reign of emotions over reason in the courtroom.

How Two Dogs May Have Foiled a Kidnapping

Did these two dogs just follow their programming? Or do they really care? How do they come to care?
Nobody knows how instinctive information develops in a dog, or where it is stored, or how it is fetched, decoded, or executed.