Denyse O’Leary

Denyse O’Leary is a freelance journalist based in Victoria, Canada. Specializing in faith and science issues, she is co-author, with neuroscientist Mario Beauregard, of The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul; and with neurosurgeon Michael Egnor of The Immortal Mind: A Neurosurgeon’s Case for the Existence of the Soul (Worthy, 2025). She received her degree in honors English language and literature.

Archives

Does a Decline in Reading Mean a Decline in Thinking?

Thinking is natural to humans. But the current decline in reading may signal a worrisome decline in a particular TYPE of thinking
If we reach the point where most people cannot muster the level of sustained attention needed to read a book, political changes unwelcome to many of us are inevitable.

Right Now, Science Seems To Be Growing Stale…

If we judge by the number of dead end controversies... And this is just when we might expect it to be booming
Perhaps the endless theorizing with so little result reflects what chance can produce. If researchers ever felt they could risk trying design, we could see if more insight follows.

Slime Molds and the Growing Controversy Around “Intelligence”

How they solve problems with no brain, no nervous system, no conventional sense organs is creating challenges in defining intelligence
Instead of claiming, like the eliminationist, that neither humans nor slime molds are really intelligent, the panpsychist will claim that they both are — and then minimize the difference between them.

Is Talking to Animals Really AI’s “Next Ethical Minefield”?

Curiously, the Bloomberg article focuses not on the potential for new understanding of animals but the risks that that understanding is thought to pose
Some researchers seem to think that communicating with animals via AI will show that they have minds like human ones. But their behavior does not suggest that.

Scholars’ Mag Offers Sympathetic Review of Non-Materialist Books

The books are Antony Flew’s There is a God and Michael Egnor’s The Immortal Mind. Unusually for these times, NAS’s mag listens to both sides
Materialists cannot apply common standards for assessing evidence because they must refute all evidence of non-materialism. That makes them hard to argue with.

Isn’t the AI March of Dooms Getting a Bit Ridiculous Now?

The recent military incident of concern stemmed from an analyst relying on a hallucinating chatbot — surely an avoidable error
In an interesting cultural development, it’s easy to find people on the left and the right who are skeptical of the Doomers’ motives.

As Scholars Use AI To Write Papers, Are They Courting Doom?

Questions arise like, what even IS an author? Why does authorship matter? Why should students learn to write? And who needs scholars?
If academic papers in a discipline can be mostly AI written, why credential scholars anyway? Perhaps the discipline itself is obsolete.

Those Demons at the Core – a Novel

Dr. Geoffrey Simmons’s taut new thriller, Oppenheimer’s Demon, envisions a nuclear threat aimed at the city
Simmons is, among other things, a disaster preparedness expert. He portrays the growing panic in and around Chicago as word of a potential nuclear blast leaks out.

Unexpected: Plants Undermine Materialist Consciousness Theory?

Plant scientist Calvo’s critique of neuron-based theories appears not to be hippie panpsychism; he is asking hard science questions
If cognition can exist without a specific material substrate, one possible implication is that an underlying force seeks expression by whatever means are available.