Robert J. Marks II

Director, Senior Fellow, Walter Bradley Center for Natural & Artificial Intelligence
Robert J. Marks Ph.D. is Senior Fellow and Director of the Bradley Center and is Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Baylor University. Marks is a Fellow of both the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) and Optica (formerly the Optical Society of America). He was the former Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and is the current Editor-in-Chief of BIO-Complexity. Marks is author of the books Non-Computable You: What You Do That Artificial Intelligence Never Will Never Do and The Case For Killer Robots. He is co-author of the books For a Greater Purpose: The Life and Legacy of Walter BradleyNeural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks and Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics. For more information, see Dr. Marks’s expanded bio.

Archives

Will AI Make the World Better or Worse? 

If computers and AI took over the world, would we even notice? Today, host Robert J. Marks ponders this question as he continues his conversation with Dr. Donald Wunsch about his experiences with AI and his recent article in the IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine on artificial general intelligence. In Part 4 of the discussion, Dr. Wunsch argues that computers have already taken over the world without most people noticing. He provides evidence and examples. The conversation also addresses cognitive and emotional processing in AI systems, noting that while machines can simulate emotional recognition, they lack the embodied lived experience humans possess. Wunsch believes that AI represents a transformative force comparable to or exceeding past industrial revolutions. Like the

125 Flubbed Headline Prompts to AI

Double meanings, double trouble: The art of reading between the lines
Flubbed headlines are fun. There are typically two meanings. One is the obvious meaning, meant by the writer of the headline. The second is an interpretation, which can be hilarious.

Monday Micro Softy 61: Take Five

Crack the beat: a logic puzzle in rhythm and time
The western scale is based on natural acoustic harmonics from the physics of vibrating strings and resonant acoustics from sound columns.

Artificial Intelligence: Navigating the Hype, Limitations, and Ethics

On this episode of Mind Matters News, our conversation continues with Dr. Donald Wunsch on his experiences with AI and his recent article in the IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine about artificial general intelligence. He first reminds us why Artificial General Intelligence is a problematic term and why AGI is very unlikely to arrive by 2030, as some people estimate. Wunsch emphasizes that autonomy is a key capability that current AI systems lack compared to natural intelligence, and that claims of achieving AGI are overstated given the field’s current limitations in this area. Also in this segment, Wunsch cautions about the risks of AI, particularly to privacy, noting various ways AI can erode privacy for those who use it. This is Part 3 of a 6-part

Monday Microsofty 60: Here’s a Puzzle From Gunsmoke

Told to “get out of Dodge” after a shooting, a gunslinger does so at a nearly inexplicable time. Can you solve the puzzle?
To solve Microsofty 59, recall that direction of air flow is due to pressure — not size. Which tire is under more pressure?

The Ins and Outs of Scaling Up AI: Dr. Donald Wunsch

On this episode of Mind Matters News, we’re continuing our conversation with Dr. Donald Wunsch on his experiences with AI and his recent article in the IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine about artificial general intelligence. This is the second part of our conversation with Dr. Wunsch, so if you’ve not listened to the first part, we encourage you to do so. In this segment, Dr. Wunsch argues that the concept of “general intelligence” is misguided, and that intelligence is inherently specific to the needs of each organism or individual. Wunsch also discusses the work of Demis Hassabis and DeepMind, who have made significant advances in AI systems like AlphaGo and DeepFold. The discussion also touches on the policy implications of AI development, including the

Dr. Donald C. Wunsch: A Level-Headed Approach to AI’s Promise and Peril

In today’s episode, host Robert J. Marks begins a multi-episode conversation with Dr. Donald C. Wunsch II, endowed professor of electrical and computer engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology and director of the Kummer Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. Dr. Wunsch has spent decades working on the intersection of engineering AI and real world systems with research spanning neural networks, adaptive systems, machine learning, and AI engineering. In today’s segment, Dr. Wunsch discusses a paper he recently wrote that challenges both techno-optimism and doomsday narratives, arguing that the greatest dangers of AI arise not from autonomous machines, but from human misuse, poor policy and concentrated power. This is Part 1 of a

Robert J. Marks Remembers Tech Pioneer Walter Bradley

On today’s episode of Mind Matters News, Dr. Robert J. Marks joins Andrew McDiarmid, host of the ID The Future podcast, to share some of his personal anecdotes and professional insights about Dr. Walter Bradley, a scientist, humanitarian, and trailblazer in the world of intelligent design who passed away this year at the age of 81. As Marks explains, one way Bradley greatly impacted the lives of others was through pioneering work in the field of appropriate technology. Bradley was driven to apply his engineering skills to address the needs of third-world countries, realizing they often required technology appropriate for their context, rather than sophisticated materials or weapons. Bradley’s work focused on helping local citizens take the lead at the local level. Marks also

Exploring Consciousness in Human and Artificial Intelligence

Today on Mind Matters News, hosts Robert J. Marks and Brian Krouse conclude their four-part conversation with Dr. Joseph Green on the limitations of modern neuroscience. Green is author of a chapter in the volume Minding the Brain called “On the Limitations of Cutting-Edge Neuroscience.” In today’s final segment, the discussion centers on comparing different models of consciousness, including panpsychism and the simulation hypothesis. The question of consciousness in AI is also addressed. Green notes that while depth in neural networks can lead to more sophisticated abilities, this is not truly an “emergent property” in the strict sense. The issue of alignment, ensuring AI systems like ChatGPT behave in line with human values and intentions, is

Doug Smith: A Critical Look at Apple’s Virtual Reality Headset

What happens when you let Big Tech control how you see the world? Apple recently released a new model of the Apple Vision Pro headset. Although it can provide immersive experiences, what are the potential downsides to furthering our connection to the digital realm? On this episode of Mind Matters News out of the vault, host Robert J. Marks welcomes Doug Smith to the show to discuss the human impact of virtual reality technology. Doug is a senior software engineer with Covenant Eyes who is interested in the psychological impact of modern media. Our addiction to screens is addressed in his book Intentional: How Screens Secretly Shape Your Desires and How You Can Break Free. Doug works to help individuals and families break free from screen addiction so they can live out their

Micro Softy 54: A Plane Problem for Aspiring Engineers

The senator is leaving Washington to avoid the governor and their planes are headed in opposite directions
How much faster was the governor’s plane goingthan the senator’s?/ChatGPT. Today’s Micro Softy tests whether you are clever enough with math to code computers or be an engineer. Here’s the story: Senator Kornn did not like Governor Friar. Both were from Texas. When Kornn learned that Governor Friar was visiting Washington, DC, Kornn said “This town’s not big enough for the both of us.”  So Kornn decided to leave DC for that period. Kornn and Friar get on planes at the same time. One was at Reagan International Airport in DC and the other was at the Dallas Fort Worth (DFW) Airport. So each was flying to the other’s airport. Both planes took off at the same time. After a while, Kornn looked out of his first-class window and saw Friar’s plane

How Neuroscience and Philosophy Combine to Illuminate the Nature of Consciousness

Today on Mind Matters News, hosts Robert J. Marks and Brian Krouse continues their conversation with Dr. Joseph Green on how we can bridge the gap between cutting-edge neuroscience and philosophy of mind. Green is author of a chapter in the volume Minding the Brain called “On the Limitations of Cutting-Edge Neuroscience.” In today’s installment, the discussion first touches on the concept of self-consciousness. Green explains that self-consciousness is a key defining property of humans that is important to understand. Neuroscientists try to study aspects of self-consciousness, like proprioception, but this can often be done reductively and can lose the essence of the full experience. Green goes on to discuss the study of social consciousness as another possible

Monday Micro Softy 53: Kicking In the Door

To solve this puzzle, you will need to sharpen your abductive reasoning skills
There are actually two possible solutions to last week's puzzle, depending on how you interpret the pattern of the arithmetic.

Bridging the Gap Between Neuroscience and Philosophy of Mind

On this episode of Mind Matters News, hosts Robert J. Marks and Brian Krouse continue their conversation with Dr. Joseph Green on the limitations of cutting-edge neuroscience. In this segment, the focus turns to the philosophical questions involved. As Dr. Green explains, neuroscience is limited in its ability to answer philosophical questions about the nature of the mind and its relationship to the brain. As a result, the materialistic monist view that humans are nothing but their brains is a belief that goes beyond what neuroscience can actually prove. Dr. Green argues that there is room for alternative metaphysical models that posit some immaterial component to the mind, which neuroscience cannot detect or rule out. This is Part 2 of a three-part conversation.  Additional