David Boze

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

The Republican Anti-Science Brain

On this episode of ID the Future, David Boze discusses Chris Mooney’s recent article in The Huffington Post entitled Why Republicans Deny Science: The Quest for a Scientific Explanation. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

The Problem With Peer-Review

On this episode of ID the Future, host David Boze interviews Casey Luskin about the importance of peer-review within the scientific community. The 50th pro-intelligent design paper was just recently published in 2011, despite the frequent claim by critics that there are no peer-reviewed published papers supporting ID. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Lincoln & Darwin: One Night Only, pt. 2

On this episode of ID The Future, host David Boze continues his discussion with Professor Steven Fuller about his play Lincoln & Darwin: One Night Only,a unique look at the philosophies of both influential men and how the might respond to the issues of modern society. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Conservatives as Heretics

On this episode of IDTF, host David Boze interviews CSC senior fellow David Klilnghoffer about his piece in the American Spectator looking at why many in the media and politics are abusing the word science by converting it into a verbal bullying tool to force opposition to conform to political agendas. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Are Pre-Cambrian Fossils the Solution to Darwin’s Dilemma?

On this episode of ID the Future, David Boze interviews Casey Luskin about a new study which determined that Precambrian microfossils could not have been evolutionary ancestors of the complex animals that appear in the Cambrian explosion. Previously, Darwinian paleontologists believed these fossils were multicellular animal embryos, but computer tomographic analysis has now shown they were single-celled algae-like organisms. As Boze and Luskin explain, they cannot be the solution to “Darwin’s Dilemma.”

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Are New State Laws Properly Labeled “Creationist”?

On this podcast, David Boze is joined by CSC program manager for public policy and legal affairs, Joshua Youngkin to discuss several recent science education bills filed in the legislatures of New Hampshire and Indiana. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Dover and the “ID is dead” meme

On this podcast, David Boze interviews CSC Research Coordinator Casey Luskin discussing the “ID is Dead” internet meme. They review problems with the Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling, and how ID has thrived despite the intolerant environment in the post-Dover world. Listen in as they discuss exciting recent developments in science, media, and the next generation of students who are carrying the torch of ID.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

“Anti-Science”: Unpacking a Distorted Label, pt. 2

On this episode of ID The Future, we return to the topic of the anti-science label and how opponents of intelligent design try to stifle the debate by using this unscientific term. Tune in to hear host David Boze review some of the latest examples of this tactic, including a recent article in New Scientist Magazine warning of unscientific America and its “dangerous retreat from reason.” Boze also reviews definitions of science, just to be clear on what science is and what it isn’t.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

The Impact of Signature In The Cell on the ID debate in Britain

On this episode of ID The Future, host David Boze interviews CSC Director, Dr. Stephen Meyer about his recent trip to London and new ID developments in the UK. Additionally, they discuss how well Meyer’s book Signature in the Cell is holding up to the latest scientific research.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Senator Joe Lieberman on Intelligent Design & the “Anti-Science” Label

On this episode of ID The Future, host David Boze interviews former vice-presidential candidate Senator Joe Lieberman on seeing the hand of a designer in nature and the label of “anti-science” being attached to those who see evidence of design in nature. Read More ›