mathematician

charlesdarwin2

David Berlinski & Michael Denton, Pt. 3: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Worldview

On this episode of ID The Future from the vault, mathematician David Berlinski joins biochemist Michael Denton for continued discussion on the difficulties of Darwinian evolution to be a viable modern theory of the origin and development of life and the cosmos. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

David Berlinski & Michael Denton, Pt. 3: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Worldview

On this episode of ID The Future, mathematician David Berlinski joins biochemist Michael Denton for continued discussion on the difficulties of Darwinian evolution to be a viable modern theory of the origin and development of life and the cosmos. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

William Dembski’s Advice for Young Intelligent Design Scientists

On this episode of ID the Future, Anika Smith interviews mathematician and philosopher William Dembski on a break from teaching at Discovery Institute’s Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design. Listen in as Dr. Dembski shares his advice for young scientists interested in ID and the hope he has for the future of intelligent design.

id-thumbnail
Intelligent Design Video
Default Intelligent Design play button featured image

Mathematician Granville Sewell on Evolution and Intelligent Design

UT mathematician Granville Sewell has produced a book of essays spanning a wide variety of issues related to the debate over evolution. Besides biological evolution, it also deals with the Big Bang, the fine-tuning of the laws of physics, quantum mechanics, and even design in mathematics.

For more about In the Beginning and Other Essays on Intelligent Design go here. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

David Berlinski and The Deniable Darwin

On today’s episode of ID the Future, mathematician and consummate skeptic David Berlinski shares with Discovery President Bruce Chapman about his award-winning essays from Commentary Magazine and the answers that are unacceptable to the scientific community. Read More ›