Intelligent Design

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

An Immunologist Explains Why the Immune System Isn’t an Example of Darwinian Evolution

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Donald L. Ewert, a research immunologist/virologist who spent much of his career studying the molecular and cell biology of the immune system, as well as theories about its evolution. Dr. Ewert recently wrote a response at Evolution News & Views to BioLogos’ Dr. Kathryn Applegate. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Multiverse Theory: Avoiding the Evidence of Design in our Universe

Which requires more faith? A belief in multiple universes or a belief in the intelligent design of our universe? On this episode of ID The Future, host David Boze explores the ideas found in a Harper’s Magazine article by MIT physicist and author Alan Lightman. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Film The Revisionaries Revises History of 2009 Texas State Board of Education Evolution Debate

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin shows how the film The Revisionaries revises history. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Part 2: Dog Breeds: Proof of Macroevolution?

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin once again sits down with geneticist Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, continuing their discussion of whether dogs could have evolved by Darwinian evolution. Read Dr. Lönnig’s article on the topic at http://www.weloennig.de. For part one of this podcast, see Dog Breeds: Proof of Macroevolution?.

id-thumbnail
Intelligent Design Video
Default Intelligent Design play button featured image

Conversations with William Dembski–The Tang Problem

Materialism says that everything is an organized complexity of matter, a bottom up perspective on our world. Dembski uses Tang to describe the problem with this view: You can take orange juice and extract orange juice ‘solids’, but you can never fully create orange juice again; but that is what materialism attempts to do.
Read More ›

id-thumbnail
Intelligent Design Video
Default Intelligent Design play button featured image

Conversations with William Dembski–Information All the Way Down

In this clip, William Dembski discusses information realism, the notion that the fundamental “stuff” of the world is information–not matter. An example of this is found in the recent search for the Higgs boson particle. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

How We Know Intelligent Design Is Science

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin addresses the question: Is intelligent design science? While the precise definition of “science” has long been debated, most would agree that there are certain qualities that clearly define some ideas as science. Read More ›

id-thumbnail
Intelligent Design Video
Default Intelligent Design play button featured image

Conversations with William Dembski–Inspired by Richard Dawkins

In this clip, William Dembski discusses how his work on intelligent design is largely inspired by famous atheist Richard Dawkins. Dembski found Dawkins’ The Blind Watchmaker “insightfully wrong,” and actually based his work on trying to answer some of the issues it raises. Read More ›

id-thumbnail
Intelligent Design Video
Default Intelligent Design play button featured image

Conversations with William Dembski–Being as Communion in Relation to Previous Work

In this clip, William Dembski describes how his new book Being as Communion fits with the other books he has written. In Being as Communion Dembski creates a metaphysical backdrop or worldview that challenges the traditional materialistic framework, therefore adding context to his previous work. Read More ›

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button

Does Science Show “There Was No First Human”?

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin talks with Dr. Ann Gauger about her criticisms of the PBS video, “There Was No First Human,” that attempts to show how evolutionary change happens. The video makes the claim that evolution has been a continuous and gradual process–a claim that many evolutionary biologists would disagree with, and that is not supported by evidence from the fossil record. Listen in as Dr. Gauger explains.