{"id":1582,"date":"2009-08-17T00:21:47","date_gmt":"2009-08-17T00:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/discovery.org\/tech\/2009\/08\/17\/from_the_oregonianfrontiers_in\/"},"modified":"2024-10-15T21:56:50","modified_gmt":"2024-10-15T21:56:50","slug":"from_the_oregonianfrontiers_in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/2009\/08\/17\/from_the_oregonianfrontiers_in\/","title":{"rendered":"Wake up, Oregon!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.oregonlive.com\/business\/index.ssf\/2009\/08\/frontiers_technical_leap_worri.html\">From<\/a> the <i>Oregonian<\/i>,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Frontier&#8217;s inexperience is a concern, Jenks said. But if Verizon doesn&#8217;t want to be here, perhaps Oregon will be better off.<br \/>\n&#8220;Sometimes,&#8221; he said, &#8220;it&#8217;s to your advantage to get rid of an owner who doesn&#8217;t want to own something.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Who wouldn&#8217;t want to own something that makes a profit, <i>unless<\/i>&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t make a profit?<br \/>\nOregon&#8217;s problem is that it has driven the profit out of the telephone business, so the industry&#8217;s innovation leader &#8212; Verizon &#8212; is getting out.<br \/>\nNationwide, Verizon is investing $28 billion in fiber to the home, but it needs to earn a competitive return on investment.  That isn&#8217;t possible in Oregon, which aims to align the price consumers pay for communications services with the bare cost providers incur to offer the service.<br \/>\nThat&#8217;s not a bad strategy, from a consumer perspective, if the network is already in the ground, it can&#8217;t be removed and it doesn&#8217;t need to be upgraded.<br \/>\nBut this is where the Oregon Public Utility Commission and the Citizens Utility Board have missed the ball.<br \/>\nThe network must be upgraded &#8212; in a major way &#8212; if Oregon wants to keep up with the rest of the nation and the world.<br \/>\nInvestment will flow to where it can earn a profit.  If investment can&#8217;t earn a profit in Oregon, it will go somewhere else.<br \/>\nThat&#8217;s why Verizon is selling its Oregon properties to Frontier.  Verizon can&#8217;t earn a competitive profit on its investment in Oregon compared to other states.  Oregon doesn&#8217;t have population density or a favorable regulatory climate.<br \/>\nFrontier is an excellent company.  But of course it isn&#8217;t Verizon &#8212; the leader in fiber optic deployment.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s Oregon&#8217;s choice.<br \/>\nAlthough the Verizon-Frontier sale has already been announced (but not yet approved by regulators), Oregon could still position itself as a hospitable environment for private enterprise in the telecommunications space.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Oregonian, Frontier&#8217;s inexperience is a concern, Jenks said. But if Verizon doesn&#8217;t want to be here, perhaps Oregon will be better off. &#8220;Sometimes,&#8221; he said, &#8220;it&#8217;s to your advantage to get rid of an owner who doesn&#8217;t want to own something.&#8221; Who wouldn&#8217;t want to own something that makes a profit, unless&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t make a profit? Oregon&#8217;s problem is that it has driven the profit out of the telephone business, so the industry&#8217;s innovation leader &#8212; Verizon &#8212; is getting out. Nationwide, Verizon is investing $28 billion in fiber to the home, but it needs to earn a competitive return on investment. That isn&#8217;t possible in Oregon, which aims to align the price consumers pay for communications<a class=\"ellipsis article-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/2009\/08\/17\/from_the_oregonianfrontiers_in\/\"><span> Read More &rsaquo;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":219,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[112],"class_list":["post-1582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"author_names":["Hance Haney"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/219"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1582"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1582"}],"wp:action-assign-author":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.discovery.org\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post\/1582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}