ID

J. Sjogren & R. DiSilvestro
March 20, 2002
Intelligent Design

Fifty-two Ohio Scientists Call for Academic Freedom on Darwin’s Theory

J. Sjogren & R. DiSilvestro
March 20, 2002
Intelligent Design

Note: This list of 52 scientists was assembled by Jody Sjogren and Robert DiSilvestro of Ohio. Discovery Institute is pleased to help in publicizing this list. Contact:Jody Sjogren (614) 485-8000 metstudios@mindspring.comRobert DiSilvestro (614) 292-6848 disilvestro.1@osu.edu To Enhance the Effectiveness of Ohio Science Education, as Scientists … We Affirm: That biological evolution is an important scientific theory that should be taught Read More ›

-stockpack-adobe-stock.jpg
Scientific Journals
Licensed from Adobe Stock
Lynn Vincent
February 26, 2000
Intelligent Design

Science vs. Science

Lynn Vincent
February 26, 2000
Intelligent Design
The debate over the teaching of evolution isn't just in Kansas anymore, as other states take up the issue. While these battles make headlines, they are the fruit of a scholarly movement that has shaken up the scientific establishment. WORLD talked to four "Intelligent Design" revolutionaries who are fighting Darwinists on their own terms. Read More ›
bradley-ziffer-269009-unsplash
Photo by Bradley Ziffer on Unsplash
William A. Dembski
March 1, 1998
Intelligent Design

The Intelligent Design Movement

William A. Dembski
March 1, 1998
Intelligent Design
The Intelligent Design movement begins with the work of Charles Thaxton, Walter Bradley, Michael Denton, Dean Kenyon, and Phillip Johnson. Without employing the Bible as a scientific text, these scholars critiqued Darwinism on scientific and philosophical grounds. On scientific grounds they found Darwinism an inadequate framework for biology. On philosophical grounds they found Darwinism hopelessly entangled with naturalism, the view that nature is self-sufficient and thus without need of God or any guiding intelligence. More recently, scholars like Michael Behe, Stephen Meyer, Paul Nelson, Jonathan Wells, and myself have taken the next step, proposing a positive research program wherein intelligent causes become the key for understanding the diversity and complexity of life. Read More ›