Intelligent Design

The Center for Science and Culture

Survival of the Fittest? Darwin meets Intelligent Design

This article, published by Chron, mentions Discovery Institute Senior Fellow Stephen C. Meyer: In a Freudian slip of biblical proportions, the reporter misquoted Dr. Stephen C. Meyer, director of the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture, an advocacy group for ID. The rest of the article can be found here.

The Origins of Life: A Catholic View

Since the Theory of Evolution touches on the subject of human origins, the Catholic Church naturally has a deep interest in the topic. There are three important questions: How does the creation account in Genesis square with what science can reasonably demonstrate about the origin of the universe and mankind? What are the implications of Darwinian anthropology, which understands the Read More ›

Scopes Turns 80

In the 1925 Scopes Trial, a young science teacher by the name of John T. Scopes was prosecuted for teaching evolution in a public school — an act prohibited by a Tennessee statute. Although the trial court ruled against Scopes, the judgment was less important than its wider impact on culture. The historian George Marsden points out that “it was Read More ›

The Evolution Wars

This article, published by Times, mentions Discovery Institute: Since the 1987 decision, a devoted band of mostly religious Christians, including hundreds of scientists, engineers, theologians and philosophers, has written papers and books, contributed to symposiums on the perceived problems with Darwin’s theory. The headquarters for such thinking is the Center for Science and Culture at a nonpartisan but generally conservative Read More ›

Dad and boy watching dinosaur skeleton in museum
Dad and boy watching dinosaur skeleton in museum.
Photo licensed via Adobe Stock

Talking with Dinosaurs

Despite the best efforts of Dr Steven Meyer, an American scientist who was the lone voice arguing for "intelligent design", the BBC trio tried to present it as no more than a cause for religious nutters, an "upgrade" of creationism. Sir David Attenborough clearly had not the slightest idea of what the "intelligent design" thesis is about. Read More ›

No, Your Honor

Eighty years ago on July 21, high school teacher John Scopes was convicted in a stifling Dayton, Tenn., courtroom of teaching students about Darwin’s theory of evolution contrary to state law. Made famous by the play and film “Inherit the Wind,” the Scopes trial has become an icon in the continuing battle for free speech and scientific inquiry. Unfortunately, it’s Read More ›

scene-scopes-trial
Several prosecutors standing, arms folded at Scopes Trial
From the "Of Monkeys and Men: Public and Private Views from the Scopes Trial" Collection

When the Lines Were Drawn

To nobody's surprise, Scopes was found guilty — he had clearly broken the law — but the verdict did little to resolve the difficulties over teaching evolution in public schools. This year alone, 13 states have introduced legislation that would require schoolteachers to take a more critical approach toward evolutionary theory. Read More ›
magazines
Pile of Open magazines, blue toned image
Pile of Open magazines, blue toned image

Designs on Us

To my surprise, it turned out that almost all those surveyed, including several NR editors and contributors, were doubters not of Darwinism but of Intelligent Design. Read More ›

President Bush’s Support for Free Speech on Evolution and Intelligent Design Draws Praise from Discovery Institute

Join The Free Speech on Evolution Campaign. Scientists, teachers, and students are under attack for questioning evolution – click here to help us help them. In a discussion with reporters on Monday, President George W. Bush supported local control on how evolution is taught but also expressed support for exposing students to different views about evolution. “I think that part of Read More ›

Discovery Institute Says Comments by Kansas Science Standards Writing Committee Co-Chair About Evolution and Science Standards Are False and Misleading

Seattle — On Tuesday, August 2, the Kansas Science Standards Writing Committee will meet to consider a draft “Response” to the current working draft of the Kansas Science Standards. The “Response” was apparently prepared by Writing Committee Co-Chair Prof. Steve Case, a long-time activist with Darwin-only lobbying group, Kansas Citizens for Science. “Unfortunately, the proposed ‘Response’ is mostly misinformation and red Read More ›