
Discovery.org

An Analysis of the Expert Testimony of Prof. David Hillis before the Texas State Board of Education on January 21, 2009
At the January meeting of the Texas State Board of Education (TSBOE), University of Texas Austin professor David Hillis asserted that there are no legitimate scientific weaknesses in neo-Darwinian evolution. He stated that scientific weaknesses in evolution have “no scientific basis” and … » Go

An Analysis of the Expert Testimony of Prof. Ronald Wetherington before the Texas State Board of Education on January 21, 2009

A Scientific History and Philosophical Defense of the Theory of Intelligent Design
In December of 2004, the renowned British philosopher Antony Flew made worldwide news when he repudiated a lifelong commitment to atheism, citing, among other factors, evidence of intelligent design in the DNA molecule. In that same month, the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit to prevent … » Go

Intelligent Design (ID) Has Scientific Merit Because it Uses the Scientific Method to Make its Claims and Infers Design by Testing its Positive Predictions

Intelligent Design Has Scientific Merit in Paleontology

ID is Constitutional and has Educational and Legal Merit

Darwin of the Gaps

Intelligent Design 101
Intelligent Design 101 brings together leading scholars and researchers from the fields of science and intelligent design studies, such as Michael Behe and Phillip Johnson. Their detailed and insightful essays form an introduction to intelligent design, from the basics of the theory, to … » Go
Intelligent Design 101: Leading Experts Explain the Key Issues

Intelligent Design: A Brief Introduction
Intelligent design (ID) studies patterns in nature that are best explained as the result of intelligence. Is that radio signal from outer space just random noise or the result of an alien intelligence? Is that chunk of rock just a random chunk of rock or an arrowhead? Is Mount Rushmore the … » Go

The Facts about Intelligent Design
A 1982 poll found that only 9% of Americans believed that humans developed through purely natural evolutionary processes. Two years later, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued its first Science and Creationism booklet, stating that science and religion occupy … » Go