Search Results for “Michael J. Behe”

Discovery.org

Michael Behe: A Mousetrap for Darwin

_{Michael J. Behe and John G. West
November 21, 2020}

Biochemist Michael Behe, author of Darwin’s Black Box, Darwin Devolves, and other books, discusses his new book A Mousetrap for Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers His Critics with John West, Associate Director of the Center for Science and Culture, and fields questions from an international … » Go

Darwin Is on the Roof — New Book from Michael Behe, Available Now

_{David Klinghoffer
November 19, 2020}

As biochemist Michael Behe explains in the Introduction to his new book, out today — A Mousetrap for Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers His Critics — the public is being prepared very slowly for the demise of Darwinian evolutionary theory.

… » Go

The Edge of Evolution feat. Michael Behe

_{Michael J. Behe
June 22, 2020}

How much of life does Darwin’s theory explain? What is the edge of evolution?

… » Go

Selected Journal Articles by Michael Behe

_{Michael J. Behe
March 11, 2020}

Getting There First: An Evolutionary Rate Advantage for Adaptive Loss-of-Function Mutations Michael J. Behe Biological Information: New Perspectives, edited by R. J. Marks II, M. J. Behe, W. A. Dembski, and B. L. Gordon. World Scientific Publishing, Hong Kong, 450-473. Abstract: Over the … » Go

A Review of Intelligent Design: William A. Dembski & Michael Ruse in Dialogue

_{Logan Paul Gage
October 16, 2008}

Intelligent Design: William A. Dembski & Michael Ruse in Dialogue Edited by Robert B. Stewart Fortress Press, 2007, 257 pages Despite—or perhaps because of—the great volume of books published annually on Darwinian evolution and intelligent design, few new contributions are worth the time of … » Go

Interview with Michael Behe on The Edge of Evolution

_{Discovery Institute
June 18, 2007}

Question & Answer with Michael J. Behe, Author of The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism What do you believe Darwinian evolutionary processes can actually do? The Edge of Evolution asks the sober question, what is it reasonable to think Darwinian evolutionary processes … » Go

The Case of Behe vs. Darwin

_{Josh Getlin
November 5, 2005}

“Intelligent design is not the dominant view of the scientific community,” he said. “But I’m pleased with the progress we are making.” After two grueling days on the stand, Behe looked drained. He was also unbowed. In a nationally watched trial that could determine whether intelligent … » Go

Behe’s letter in the WSJ responding to Feb. 13 article by Sharon Begley

_{Michael J. Behe
February 27, 2004}

“We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful … » Go

Michael Ruse is Just Confused!

_{Michael J. Behe
July 1, 2002}

This article appeared in a discussion on the topic of intelligent design published in the July/August, 2002 issue of Research News & Opportunity In Science And Theology. Other contributoring thinkers included Karl Giberson, Michael Ruse, Eugenie Scott, William Dembski, Robert Pennock, and … » Go

Michael Behe’s Response to Boston Review Critics

_{Michael J. Behe
March 1, 1997}

The following is Michael Behe’s response to the essays published by Boston Review following Allen Orr’s review of Darwin’s Black Box. Allen Orr Professor Orr has a mistaken notion of irreducible complexity. I thought I made that clear in my reply, but from his response I … » Go

Darwin Devolves Book Party

_{The Center for Science and Culture
July 10, 2019}

While Stephen Colbert has called Michael J. Behe the “Father of Intelligent Design,” Behe’s arguments have been called “close to heretical” by the New York Times Book Review, and Richard Dawkins has publicly taken him to task for his “maverick” views. Wherever he goes, Behe makes … » Go

Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design?

_{Michael J. Behe
April 23, 2002}

Talk delivered at the American Museum of Natural History, 23 April 2002 at a discussion titled “Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design?” The participants included ID proponents William A. Dembski and Michael J. Behe as well as evolutionists Kenneth R. Miller and Robert T. Pennock. Eugenie C. … » Go

1 2 3 … 15 Next