As Günter Bechly used to wryly observe, human evolution is a subject that is constantly being “rewritten,” often accompanied by much media fanfare.

The first thing that comes to mind in the context of intellectual capabilities is brain size.

This opens up a world of potential functions for repetitive DNA that open-minded scientists can consider.

Endogenous retroviruses were at one time iconic for evolution activists. The debate has progressed a lot since then.

Human chromosomal fusion has often been cited as strong evidence supporting human-ape common ancestry. It’s not.

So we’re talking about fossils that are very humanlike, if not essentially completely human.

It seemed like lots of people wanted to forget about the femur, because years went by and nothing was published about the bone.

Many have called this fossil a human ancestor that lived at about 7 million years ago, around the time of our supposed most recent common ancestor with chimps.

The technical paper acknowledges that this level of oxygenation, if sustained, would indeed “challenge the view” that oxygen was a trigger for animal evolution.

This finding should be major news in the science world, yet those involved don’t seem interested in highlighting the discovery.

In our experience, what cause generates conditional logic circuits, and then what cause re-uses those algorithmic programs over and over in different systems?

Unfortunately, Judge Jones got this simple question exactly wrong, giving life to a myth. This alone speaks volumes about his ruling.

Any scientific theory for the origin of life and the universe is only as strong as its research program. For intelligent design, this is good news. On today’s ID The Future, Dr. Casey Luskin describes the current growth and scientific maturity of the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. … » Go

Was the modern intelligent design (ID) movement “over after Dover,” as many ID critics hoped it would be? Quite the opposite. In the last two decades ID has flourished as a scientific research program and continues to gain momentum in both academia and the public square. On … » Go

Over After Dover. That was the hopeful mantra of many critics of intelligent design (ID) after the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial in 2005. They were hoping a federal judge could issue a decree from on high that would stop the ID movement cold in its tracks and neo-Darwinism could go back to being … » Go

It’s easy to be blown away by the examples of engineering prowess in the human body. But it can be challenging to turn that evidence into a robust argument for intelligent design you can share with skeptical friends and colleagues. To help you learn to do that, host Andrew McDiarmid begins … » Go

Did God use evolution to create life? On this ID The Future, we’re sharing the second half of a recent conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin that originally aired on the Truthful Hope podcast. Casey is critiquing theistic evolution, the view that God used evolutionary mechanisms to create life. … » Go

Some people attempt to reconcile belief in God with the standard evolutionary account of life’s origins by combining the two. Theistic evolution is the view that God used evolutionary mechanisms to create life. But does this view stand up to scrutiny? Today, Dr. Casey Luskin critiques this … » Go

If evolutionary psychology explains every complex human behavior as well as its opposite, does it really explain anything? Today, host Andrew McDiarmid concludes his conversation with geologist and attorney Dr. Casey Luskin about which scientific theory of origins best explains human altruism, … » Go

Do evolutionary models adequately account for the reality of human altruism, moral conviction, and cooperation? Does intelligent design offer a better explanation? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid begins discussing these questions and more with geologist and attorney Casey Luskin. … » Go

God of the gaps. Lucy as human ancestor. Co-option to explain away irreducible complexity. Perhaps you’ve heard some of the most common objections to intelligent design, but do you know how to adequately respond to them? On today’s ID The Future, geologist and lawyer Casey Luskin … » Go

Sometimes, it’s good to go back to the basics. Whether you’re brand new to intelligent design or you’re looking for a way to share the basics with a friend or family member, we’ve got you covered today. On this ID The Future, enjoy the first half of a discussion with geologist and … » Go

The Smithsonian Institution has recently been called out by the Trump Administration for pushing “one-sided, divisive political narratives.” But American history isn’t the only domain in which the Smithsonian is advancing misinformation. The National Museum of Natural History’s … » Go